“Strange are the ways of evil. We are false in the faces of our brothers.”
Title and quote from “Anthem” by Ayn Rand.
I created this “coin” in Photoshop. The coin is resting on the 1775 “rough draft” text of the Declaration of Independence, as Jefferson probably presented it to Benjamin Franklin and John Adams for correction prior to committee. Hence, the mint mark of “1775”. At the top of the rough draft can be read “A Declaration” and “UNITED STATES”. On the bottom is the line “mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” Thus, my graphic is relevant to both then and now, as a statement of disagreement with the respective governments. On the coin, the legend in Latin on the outside circle reads “Nemo Me Impune Lacesset,” i.e., “No one will provoke me with impunity.” The motto “Don’t Tread on Me” is based on the Gadsden flag, the famous yellow flag with a rattle snake, an early symbol of American independence. The date corresponds to the date of Jefferson’s rough draft. The mint mark is “L”, the initial of the place the coin was made: Lafayette, IN USA.
It’s been a couple of years since I’ve done any graphic work in Photoshop. This week I worked five full-time days on this coin in preparation for Independence Day. The coin’s field incorporates the large device of the rattle snake, along with a motto, mint and date mark, making it rather cluttered, I think. However that is, it’s set in a rough and used appearance, not newly minted, a bit worn. Not silver or gold, but a copper piece, with a yellow-bronze patina. I imagined a pattern minted perhaps by a skilled colonial engraver with a heavy press, or a lone gunsmith or even a button maker who could make an accurate impression.
So here it is. It’s a symbol of the legend of a people who took the stand that “no one will provoke me with impunity”. According to that legend, America’s founders drafted documents meant to make the government afraid to tread upon the rights that each individual possesses according to his very nature as a human being. Today, it’s the obverse. Individuals are afraid to tread anywhere, for fear of breaking some new law coming down on them from their government. The defiance and rebellion the rattlesnake signified before and during the War of Independence is almost gone.
There’s a husband and wife detective agency, Randall & Craig, Confidential Investigation. They’ve been hired by the title character to find out what his profession is.
Along the way, the wife, Cynthia Craig Randall, “[R]ecalled once having seen a painting entitled “Subway”. It showed a crowd pouring out the door of an underground train while another crowd attempted to force its way it. Getting on or getting off, they were plainly in a hurry, yet it seemed to give them no pleasure. The picture had no beauty in itself; it was plain that the artist’s single purpose had been to make a bitter criticism of a way of living.” I think that painting is by Reginald Marsh (1898 – 1954) called “The Subway”.
While looking for that painting, I ran across two others of the same subject, and period, that caught my interest. There’s a 1935 painting by Daniel Celentano called “Subway”. This one shows people’s faces that are at least mostly contented, if not happy.
And there’s the painting, “Subway”, by Lily Furedi (1934). Here, we see a range of emotions from happy to sad to tired.
Discussing Jonathan Hoag, Cynthia says “That’s all very well, but I wish we had never laid eyes on him.” To which her husband, Teddy, replies, “Too late for Herpicide.” “Herpicide” is from the Latin words herpes, meaning “to creep”, and cide, meaning “death”. It was a product sold around 1899 by the “drummer” (travelling salesman), D.M. Newbro. His claim was that Herpicide would destroy dandruff, falling hair, and baldness.
Will update my reading of “The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathan Hoag” as the pleasantness of reading it proceeds….
And it ends with a surprise. And a happy one, because it is impossible for me to disbelieve the truth: that Jonathan Hoag’s profession is the most unpleasant one I could imagine. And yet, I would hire a Hoag, if I could, to do justice to my own alien art.
On another blog I had written about the overused phrase “Thank you for your service”. This declaration used to happen to me a lot. Not so much anymore. I wear a denim jacket with USMC embroidered in red above the left pocket. Just below that are miniatures of the rows of ribbons I earned during my four years in the Marine Corps. I wear it to show that I’ve lived through an adventure. When I get recognition I like to say “well, it was an adventure.”
Here’s what I said on July 29, 2012:
But I don’t care. I always feel a touch of sadness for the one wishing that on me, as if he’s staking a claim on my “experience”. He doesn’t know what he’s saying; he’s articulating what he’s picked up around him, not able to identify it as social subjectivism geared toward service–an idea now brought to life as a relevant slogan: “thank you for your service”. Ayn Rand’s statement on military service applies not to society, or any collective, but to the individual:
“Even if he enlists in the Army and hears it called “service to his country,” his feeling is that of a generous aristocrat who chose to do a dangerous task. A European soldier feels that he is doing his duty.” –Ayn Rand, Philosophy: Who Needs It, “Don’t Let It Go”, p. 253
Be that as it is, yesterday (actually, it was five days ago on February 17) I got a “thank you for your service” that I appreciated, and returned in kind. Here’s the story:
I had an appointment with a medical specialist is a small town 64 miles away. The appointment was for 1PM. We left at 10:45AM, planning to find a place to stop and have a lunch before the doctor’s appointment. We were given directions by the doctor’s office via a Yahoo map. Linda was my navigator. We missed none of the steps in the directions, but by 12;30 we found ourselves lost. I was preparing for all the costs of a missed appointment, and just find our way back home. But there was still time. We drove through little towns. The feeling was odd, as if we were back in the 1950s, and then another town the 1960s. The houses and buildings were old, but in good repair. She said about one large white house: “that had to have been built in the 1800s.” The streets were clean. All was in good order. Twice stopping at gas stations for directions, the people were kind and helpful. The directions they gave seemed so simple, but they got us further lost. I turned around, stopped at the only business building on the road, a dentist’s office. She didn’t know our destination that well. But she typed in the information and printed off new directions. There were four little local “roundabouts” to go through before making one last left turn. Finally, I could see we were damn close but one more wrong turn or missed sign and I would miss the appointment; it was now 12:50PM. And we’d driven 96 miles. I had to take the next right into an empty lot, but for a cop car.
Looking at the map one more time, I had no idea how far away we were or even if we were on the right road. I drove over to the cop car, got out and said “Hello officer” and told him our situation. Smiling, he said “you want me to take you there?” And so he did. We had a police escort (without the flashing lights)! He took us right up to the door of the doctor’s office. It was less than a mile. But we would not have found it. By then I was suffering a sensory overload what with all the twists and turns and streets with signs for this and that. I parked, went over and thanked the cop. He said “No problem. Thank you for your service”. And for the first time I ever used that phrase, I replied “thank you for your service.” And I meant it.
That cop was happy to be helpful–the way we were taught growing up in the 1950s: that cops were helpful members of our neighborhood, not to be feared.